Texas Fights Back: Rep. John Otto (R-Dayton) Files Texas House Bill 553, “The Second Amendment Preservation Act”

Bookmark and Share
Posted by

texas-leading-the-way1Texas House Bill 533 authored by Rep. John Otto (R-Dayton).

Co-authored by Rep. Jim Pitts (R-Waxahachie), Rep. Drew Darby (R-San Angelo), Rep. Jimmy Don Aycock (R-Killeen), Rep. Jim Keffer (R-Eastland), Rep. Dennis Bonnen (R-Angleton), Rep. Cindy Burkett (R-Mesquite), Rep. Sarah Davis (West University Place), Rep. Patricia Harless (R-Spring), Rep. Linda Harper-Brown (R-Irving), Rep. Byran Hughes (R-Mineola), Rep. George Lavender (R-Texarkana), Rep. Four Price (R-Amarillo), Rep. Ralph Sheffield (R-Temple), Rep. David Simpson (R-Longview), Rep. James White (R-Hillister), Rep. Paul Workman (R-Austin), Rep. John Zerwas (R-Richmond), Rep. Trent Ashby (R-Centerville), Rep. Cecil Bell (R-Como), Rep. Greg Bonnen (R-Friendswood), Rep. Tony Dale (R-Houston), Rep. John Raney (R-College Station), Rep. Phil Stephenson (R-Plainville), Rep. Ed Thompson (R-Pearland) and Rep. Rick Miller (R-Sugar Land) .

By: Otto H.B. No. 553

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

relating to firearms and the preservation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution; providing penalties.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1.  (a) This Act shall be known as the “Second Amendment Preservation Act.”

(b)  The Legislature of the State of Texas hereby finds:

(1)  Article IV, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution provides: “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof . . . shall be the supreme law of the land.”

(2)  The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, and 1799 — that State’s official response and opposition to the federal government’s Alien & Sedition Acts, which criminalized speech critical of the federal government in a clear violation of the First Amendment — were authored by Thomas Jefferson, and provide in part:

Resolved, That the several states composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that by compact, under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes, delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each state to itself the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: That to this compact each state acceded as a state, and is an integral party, its co-states forming as to itself, the other party: That the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among parties having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions, as of the mode and measure of redress.

(1798)

That the principle and construction contended by sundry of the state legislatures, that the general government is the exclusive judge of the extent of the powers delegated to it, stop nothing short of despotism, since the discretion of those who administer the government, and not the Constitution, would be the measure of their powers: That the several states who formed that instrument being sovereign and independent, have the unquestionable right to judge of its infraction, and that a nullification by those sovereignties, of all unauthorized acts done under color of that instrument, is the rightful remedy. (1799)

(3)  The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

(4)  The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

(5)  The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

(6)  That all federal acts, laws, executive orders, agency orders, and rules or regulations of all kinds with the purpose, intent, or effect of confiscating any firearm, banning any firearm, limiting the size of a magazine for any firearm, imposing any limit on the ammunition that may be purchased for any firearm, taxing any firearm or ammunition therefore, or requiring the registration of any firearm or ammunition therefore, infringes upon Texan’s right to bear arms in direct violation of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and therefore, any such law is not made in pursuance of the Constitution, is not authorized by the Constitution, and thus, is not the supreme law of the land, and consequently, is invalid in this State and shall be further considered null and void and of no effect in this State.

SECTION 2.  Chapter 46, Penal Code, is amended by adding Section 46.16 to read as follows:

Sec. 46.16.  Second Amendment Shall Remain Inviolate; Offences; Penalties.

(a)  A person who is a Peace Officer, State Officer, or State Employee commits an offense if the person, while acting under color of the person’s office or employment, intentionally enforces or attempts to enforce any acts, laws, executive orders, agency orders, rules or regulations of any kind  whatsoever of the United States government relating to confiscating any firearm, banning any firearm, limiting the size of a magazine for any firearm, imposing any limit on the ammunition that may be purchased for any firearm, taxing any firearm or ammunition therefore, or requiring the registration of any firearm or ammunition therefore.

(b)  A person who is a public servant commits an offense if the person, while acting under color of the person’s office or employment, intentionally enforces or attempts to enforce any acts, laws, executive orders, agency orders, rules or regulations of any kind whatsoever of the United States government relating to confiscating any firearm, banning any  firearm, limiting the size of a magazine for any firearm, imposing any limit on the ammunition that may be purchased for any firearm, taxing any firearm or ammunition therefore, or requiring the registration of any firearm or ammunition therefore.

(c)  For purposes of Subsections (a) and (b):

(1)  ”Firearm” is defined at Penal Code §46.01; “Peace  Officer” is defined at Government Code §614.001; and “State  Officer” and “State Employee” are defined at Government Code  §572.002.

(2)  ”Public servant,” includes an officer, employee,  or agent of the United States; a branch, department, or agency of the United States; another person acting under a contract  with a branch, department, or agency of the United States to  provide a law enforcement or security service; or any other  person acting under color of federal law.

(3)  A person acts under color of the person’s office  or employment if the person acts or purports to act in an  official capacity or takes advantage of such actual or purported capacity.

(4)  It is a defense to prosecution for an offense  under Subsection (b) that the person performed the act  consistent with an explicit and applicable grant of federal  statutory authority that is consistent with the United States  Constitution.

(d)  An offense under Subsection (a) is a Class B  misdemeanor punishable by confinement for a term not to exceed  180 days, a fine of not more than $5,000, or both the confinement and the fine.

(e)  An offense under Subsection (b) is a Class A misdemeanor punishable by confinement for a term not to exceed one year, a fine of not more than $10,000, or both the  confinement and the fine.

SECTION 3.  (a) This section applies only to a prosecution  of an offense under Section 46.16 Penal Code, as added by this Act, in which the defendant was, at the time of the alleged  offense, acting under the color of federal law.

(b)  If the government of the United States, the defendant,  or any other party challenges the validity of Section 46.16,  Penal Code, as added by this Act, on any grounds including  unconstitutionality, preemption, or sovereign immunity, the  Attorney General of Texas with the consent of the appropriate  local county or district attorney, as necessary, shall take any  and all actions required on behalf of the State to defend the  validity of the statute.

SECTION 4.  This Act shall be construed, as a matter of  state law, to be enforceable up to but no further than the  maximum possible extent consistent with federal constitutional  requirements, even if that construction is not readily apparent,  as such constructions are authorized only to the extent  necessary to save the statute from judicial invalidation.

SECTION 5.  Every provision in this Act and every  application of the provisions in this Act are severable from each other as a matter of state law. If any application of any  provision in this Act to any person or group of persons or  circumstances is found by a court to be invalid, the remainder  of this Act and the application of the Act’s provisions to all other persons and circumstances may not be affected. All constitutionally valid applications of this Act shall be severed from any applications that a court finds to be invalid, leaving the valid applications in force, because it is the legislature’s  intent and priority that the valid applications be allowed to stand alone. Even if a reviewing court finds a provision of this Act invalid in a large or substantial fraction of relevant  cases, the remaining valid applications shall be severed and allowed to remain in force.

SECTION 6.  REPORT.  The Texas Department of Public Safety shall immediately report to the governor, attorney general, and the legislature any attempt by the federal government to  implement or enforce any law in violation of this Act through the Texas Department of Public Safety, or any another state or  local law enforcement agency.

SECTION 7.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.  If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2013.

Steve Baysinger is the State Chapter Coordinator for the Texas Tenth Amendment Center.

If you enjoyed this post:
Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,

Or make a donation to help keep this site active.

Support the Tenth Amendment Center!

8 Responses to “Texas Fights Back: Rep. John Otto (R-Dayton) Files Texas House Bill 553, “The Second Amendment Preservation Act””

  1. Bobbie Fulcher says:

    Speaker of The House Joe Straus please get HB-553 on the floor and get it voted on.

  2. Bobbie Fulcher says:

    Speaker of the House Joe Straus get this bill on the floor and get it voted on,please.

  3. Brian Kennard Retired VETERAN says:

    Put the Constitution back in our country!!!! Freedom is not FREE IT IS PAID FOR IN BLOOD!!!!!!!! – Brian Kennard

  4. Kenny says:

    The US is a leach on Texas anyway.

  5. Bobby says:

    Umm… I say it’s time to let Texas go. Didn’t they want to secede anyway? They clearly have a disrespect for our system here in the United States, given their willingness to trump an entire branch of government (the courts) and decide for themselves what is constitutional. Let’s calculate the effects, and let them go!

  6. J.C. Randall says:

    I support this effort 100%. I am glad this will be a joint effort to fight back against those who want to violate our 2nd Amendment rights. I would hate having to do it alone.

  7. [...] Republican legislators introduced a bill in the state House Wednesday to render President Barack Obama’s gun control mandates null and [...]

Leave a Reply